AGENCY HANDY VS. KITCHEN.CO

Agency Handy Vs Kitchen.Co: Detailed Comparison

The above table lays out the key features and differences at a glance, diving deeper into the fundamentals can provide clearer insights into how each platform might suit your specific agency’s needs. 

1. Service Model 

Agency Handy outperforms Kitchen.co when it comes to configuring and showcasing services, offering robust functionality to create customized service catalogs and pages compared to Kitchen.co’s project-focused approach. For agencies looking to communicate their offerings clearly, Agency Handy provides the ideal toolkit.

Agency Handy’s strengths in structuring service details and promotion give Agency Handy the upper hand for agencies managing multiple lines of business. You can effortlessly highlight key information like pricing, descriptions, and available add-ons for each service in an organized and visually engaging way.

Agency Handy enables the creation of a polished online catalog where clients can browse services, get quotes, and place orders directly from the shared catalog. The customizable service pages also let you tailor pages for every service, incorporating multimedia and calls-to-action to generate leads and embedding all your services directly to your website. These powerful features make it easy to keep services updated across sales and marketing materials.

In contrast, Kitchen.co focuses more on managing active projects rather than showcasing service offerings upfront. While you can include service pricing and descriptions in client quotes, there is no centralized catalog or ability to create dedicated landing pages. This makes Kitchen.co better suited for agencies that deliver specialized services rather than diverse offerings.

With its robust catalog and page-building capabilities, Agency Handy simplifies promoting services and enables potential clients to explore offerings online easily. So for agencies looking to improve sales efficiency, Agency Handy offers superior tools to achieve service-driven growth.

2. Client Management

Agency Handy offers superior client management capabilities compared to Kitchen.co. With dedicated client profiles and a centralized client page, Agency Handy makes organizing and overseeing clients effortless.

Agency Handy’s strengths in client management give agencies better oversight to provide high-quality service. The ability to track issues via a built-in ticketing system and enable certain self-service actions provides transparency in resolving client needs. This level of client access is not matched in the Kitchen.co’s primarily internal-facing portal.

Agency Handy enables the creation of customized client profiles with key information like contacts, history, and preferences all readily available. This streamlines understanding client requirements and delivering appropriate solutions. The client list overview also enables quickly reviewing the status of all clients in one glance.

Agency Handy also provides every client with their Client portal to manage their orders, tickets & payments. A central dashboard for each client to see what is happening with their orders constantly.

In contrast, Kitchen.co lacks a centralized client section. While clients can access a basic portal to submit payments or download files, there is no single page summarizing clients. There are also no options for clients to track tickets or independently manage certain actions. This approach requires agencies to manually piece together client information.

With robust profiles, self-service capabilities, and issues tracking, Agency Handy makes account management and resolving concerns easier for improved client satisfaction. So for service agencies focused on client relationships, Agency Handy is the superior choice.

3. Order Management 

Agency Handy pulls ahead of Kitchen.co for order management, providing more advanced tracking and organization with its dashboard, structured file library, and robust management tools. For agencies that juggle multiple client projects, Agency Handy’s order oversight abilities lead the pack.

With high-level analytics and centralized storage, Agency Handy makes keeping projects on track a breeze. The intuitive dashboard offers real-time visibility into workload, issues, revenue, and other metrics so you can catch bottlenecks early. And the file library neatly organizes project assets for quick access without messy searches.

Additionally, Agency Handy equips you with a full-featured management suite to administer tasks, issues, teams, and billing. Through its powerful board views, ticket tracking, client approval options, and activity log, you can coordinate complex projects seamlessly while keeping clients looped in.

On the other hand, Kitchen.co delivers capable features for task planning and collaboration but falls short on aggregated reporting or structured documentation. While handy for lightweight coordination, the lack of portfolio-level insights and organization can hinder visibility for sprawling agencies.

With its robust toolkit, Agency Handy simplifies orchestrating client work at scale. For agencies needing an all-in-one command center to juggle a project portfolio, Agency Handy has proven superior project oversight.

4. Collaboration and Communication

Kitchen.co pulls ahead for collaboration and communication by offering robust design feedback tools compared to Agency Handy’s focus on task and project comments.

For creative agencies that regularly share visuals, Kitchen.co’s specialized design review capabilities streamline getting client input. The structured feedback system enables securely sharing files, annotating images, and tracking approvals to align on design direction.

Kitchen.co makes it simple to iterate designs based on feedback by allowing comments directly on visuals. Clients can leave notes pinned to specific elements to clarify the edits needed. The layered approval process also means you can release final files confident clients signed off.

While Agency Handy provides a full suite for commenting on tasks and orders, there are no unique tools for visual collaboration. File attachments on tasks allow sharing images but without dedicated workflows to collect feedback. This leaves collecting input and confirming approval more scattered.

With its purpose-built design review toolkit, Kitchen.co removes hassles in asset collaboration for branding, web, packaging, and similar projects. So for creative groups dependent on client feedback, Kitchen.co delivers efficiency gains.

5. Customizability

Agency Handy and Kitchen.co offer equal core customization for branding while Agency Handy provides superior intake form flexibility.

Both platforms enable customizing logos, colors, and domains to match agency aesthetics. So for baseline branding needs, Agency Handy and Kitchen.co deliver equal control to style admin views. This covers the essentials for consistency with marketing materials.

However, Agency Handy offers more advanced personalization by allowing customizable intake forms. Tailoring data flows for orders and embedding visual assets gives greater power to shape client touchpoints. Rather than relying on external forms, everything is natively integrated for smooth experiences.

With Kitchen.co limited to surface-level styling, those seeking deeper brand integration will find Agency Handy better connects. Unified workflows, branding, and data collection reduce piecing together separate solutions.

So for streamlining intake and reinforcing brand identity across client interactions, Agency Handy provides more robust and integrated tools. Both handle baseline customization equally but Agency Handy empowers further unification.

6. Integration and Scalability

Kitchen.co pulls ahead for integration with other platforms, offering native connectivity to platforms like Xero, Dropbox, Slack, and Trello. With its API and Zapier integration, Kitchen.co provides more seamless data flows across systems compared to Agency Handy.

For agencies relying on a complex technology stack, Kitchen.co’s integrations avoid manual duplication of data and processes. You can automatically sync financial details from payment processing and files from cloud storage rather than re-entering information. Its API also allows building custom functionality suited to your tech configuration.

In contrast, Agency Handy currently does not offer any out-of-the-box third-party integrations. While its roadmap includes such capabilities, adopting Agency Handy presently translates into more manual data sharing between platforms.

When it comes to multi-workspace support, Agency Handy provides more flexibility, offering unlimited workspaces depending on the plan. With Kitchen.co, you are limited to a single workspace regardless of tier.

For larger agencies managing different divisions or brands, Agency Handy’s multiple workspace options enable segmenting projects, tasks, and teams accordingly. Rather than combining everything under one account, you can create a structure that aligns with your organizational needs.

Kitchen.co’s single workspace, however, suits smaller agencies that don’t require an added layer of separation. Yet as an agency scales, it demands consolidating into additional work environments.

So for seamless connections to complementary systems, Kitchen.co is the superior choice today. But Agency Handy provides better support for operating multi-business arrangements.

7. Payment and Invoicing

Both Agency Handy and Kitchen.co provide strong capabilities for invoicing, payments, and quotes. Each platform enables creating customized project estimates and invoices, as well as supports recurring billing.

In terms of payment processing, Kitchen.co currently integrates with more gateway providers like Stripe, PayPal, Square, and others. This gives more flexibility in how clients can pay. However, Agency Handy still offers solid payment acceptance through Stripe with more options slated to come.

For overall billing and payment workflows – from upfront quotes to collecting payments on retained work – Agency Handy and Kitchen. co-deliver robust tools. Kitchen.co provides a bit more sophistication in some areas but both meet essential agency needs.

So businesses comfortable with Stripe and needing to bill clients periodically or on customized schedules can leverage either platform effectively. But for those requiring more payment gateways today or complex recurring revenue models, Kitchen.co edges out.

8. Pricing and Affordability

Kitchen.co delivers more budget-friendly monthly pricing plans compared to Agency Handy, providing better value for solos and smaller teams. Its free forever plan supports 2 users and paid monthly plans start at $29 per user, whereas Agency Handy’s starter plan is $49 monthly for just 1 user.

For larger groups, Agency Handy offers more affordable pricing with its 10-user plan at $99 monthly working out to $9.90 per user. Kitchen.co’s comparable plan for 5 users is a one-time payment of $299 working out to $59.80 per user.

Both platforms otherwise support extensive features across unlimited clients without storage limits. But for those wanting cheaper access month-to-month, Kitchen.co is more economical for smaller teams under 5 users. Agency Handy appeals more to groups above 10 needing a lower price point per user.

So solos and small businesses should weigh team size and growth outlook when selecting for value. But strictly by user pricing, Kitchen.co delivers more affordable monthly plans for under 5 user teams. For larger groups, Agency Handy provides better savings per added user. 

Agency Handy:

• Solopreneur ($49/month): For freelancers and solopreneurs, offering features like task management, invoicing, conversations, approvals, etc.
• Teams ($99/month): Geared towards small agencies (up to 10 users) needing capabilities like custom branding, file management, team communication, etc.
• Pro ($149/month): Suits bigger agencies (up to 20 users), adding options for recurring billing, dashboard analytics, access controls, and permissions.

Kitchen.co:

• Free: Allows 2 users, optimal for early-stage freelancers/agencies wanting basic project and payment management.
• Agency White Label ($29/month/user): For established agencies seeking advanced customization, design approvals, recurring invoices, etc.
• One-time Payment ($299/$599): Single payment for 5/Unlimited users, including features like custom domains, unlimited storage, branding, and more.

Kitchen.co’s free plan targets price-sensitive users, while Agency Handy offers more flexibility for enterprise agencies via seats-based monthly pricing. But Agency Handy’s lifetime deals provide better long-term value.

Agency Handy Vs Kitchen.Co: Which Software Should You Choose? 

Choosing between Agency Handy and Kitchen.co boils down to your specific needs, agency size, and the complexity of your projects. Here’s a detailed breakdown to help you decide –

For Comprehensive Client Management and Customization:

Agency Handy shines. It’s designed for agencies that require detailed service listings, tailored client intake forms, and in-depth client management, including automated communications and profile generation. If your agency’s workflow involves converting detailed client interactions into organized orders and you need a robust system to manage these processes, Agency Handy is the way to go.

For Streamlined Communication and Project Management:

Kitchen.co stands out. It’s tailored for agencies and freelancers who prioritize effective communication, seamless project management, and a user-friendly platform. 

If you’re looking for a tool that supports easy conversation flow between team members and clients, along with invoicing and deliverable management, Kitchen.co offers the necessary features. 

Its integration capabilities and customization options make it a versatile choice for those looking to tailor the platform to their brand.

Choose Agency Handy If:

• You want a centralized catalog to showcase service offerings
• Robust client management tools like profiles and ticketing systems are required
• Custom branding and design customization are important for your agency’s brand
• You want analytics and reporting through a centralized dashboard
• A structured file management system is critical to managing projects
• You want very affordable lifetime deal pricing (as low as $26 per user)

Choose Kitchen.co If:

• Your agency focuses primarily on project-based work
• Advanced collaboration through design feedback is a top priority
• Flexibility around recurring invoices is needed
• Integrations with platforms like Xero, Trello, etc. are required
• You want a free monthly plan for smaller teams
• The number of seats supported out of the box is the most cost-effective

In summary:

• Agency Handy is ideal for service-based agencies wanting an all-in-one branded client management ecosystem
• Kitchen.co better suits configurable project collaboration and task management
• Agency Handy provides more affordable lifetime deals for smaller teams
• Kitchen.co offers a free monthly plan for solos and micro-agencies

Wrapping Up

Deciding between Agency Handy and Kitchen.co boils down to your agency’s needs. Agency Handy suits agencies looking for detailed project management and scalability, while Kitchen.co is ideal for smaller teams valuing simplicity. Consider your workflow, customization needs, and growth plans when choosing, as the right platform can significantly impact your agency’s success.