Skip to content 
Webkooker is a web development and design company offering its clients a subscription-based model so they can get the best output while reducing costs.
When I spoke with WebKooker founder and CEO Kamrul Hasan Naim, the problem he described was not particularly dramatic.
There was no major system failure. No client disaster. No moment where the agency suddenly stopped functioning. It was something much more familiar. Too many small operational tasks were eating into the day.
WebKooker runs on a subscription model, so the team is constantly dealing with recurring clients, new requests, payments, invoices, project updates, feedback, and ongoing delivery.
The business model worked. But managing everything behind it was becoming the annoying part.
“Most of my day was spent switching between platforms,” Kamrul told me.
That was really the starting point of the story.
A few months after bringing more of that workflow into Agency Handy, WebKooker says its subscription and order management became 10x easier.
Results at a Glance
- 10x improvement in subscription and order management
- One place to manage subscriptions, orders, invoices, projects, and clients
- A few months to make Agency Handy part of WebKooker’s regular workflow
- Less time spent moving between separate tools
WebKooker Didn’t Have a Lack-of-Software Problem
When Kamrul explained how WebKooker had been operating before Agency Handy, one thing became clear pretty quickly.
The team already had tools. That was actually part of the problem.
Different parts of the client workflow were happening in different places. Subscriptions had to be managed. Projects needed tracking. Invoices had their own process. Client communication and updates added another layer.
None of those tasks was especially difficult.
But Kamrul kept having to move from one system to another just to understand what was happening with a client.
That is where the friction started adding up. You check the subscription in one place. Then you need to confirm something about the project. Then an invoice needs attention. Then you go looking for the latest client update. Do that once and it is nothing.
Do it across several clients, several times a day, and suddenly a good chunk of the working day is going into keeping the operation organized.
For Kamrul, that was the part that had become frustrating.
Subscription Work Made the Problem More Noticeable
WebKooker is not operating like an agency that finishes one project, sends the final invoice, and moves on.
Clients can stay subscribed and continue sending work.
That makes the relationship easier for the client, but it also means the agency has to keep much more context alive.
A client might have an active subscription, an open request, an invoice, previous feedback, and another project coming next.
All of that needs to stay connected.
Talking with Kamrul, this felt like the real operational challenge behind WebKooker’s setup.
The agency did not simply need somewhere to create tasks. It needed a clearer way to manage the whole client relationship around those tasks.
Kamrul Had Already Looked at Other Options
Agency Handy was not the first platform WebKooker considered.
Kamrul had looked at tools including Service Provider Pro, Zendo, and ManyRequests while trying to find something that matched the way WebKooker operated.
But there were trade-offs.
Some platforms did not fit the workflow particularly well. Others became harder to justify once pricing and the features WebKooker needed were considered.
There was another point Kamrul raised that stood out to me.
He did not want to make the agency’s services unnecessarily complicated just to fit the software.
WebKooker did not need a huge ecommerce-style setup around every service. It needed something flexible enough to support the way clients were already buying and receiving work.
That distinction matters.
It is easy to find software with a long feature list. It is much harder to find software that does not force you to reshape your business around that feature list.
What Changed After Moving to Agency Handy
The biggest difference was not that WebKooker suddenly gained one feature it had never seen before.
The useful part was that several things Kamrul had been managing separately could now sit much closer together.
Subscriptions could be managed alongside clients. Orders could connect more naturally with projects.
Invoices, updates, feedback, deadlines, and client activity became easier to follow without opening several systems to piece the situation together.
That changed the day-to-day workflow.
| Before | After |
| Subscription information lived separately | Subscriptions were easier to manage centrally |
| Billing followed another process | Invoices stayed closer to client activity |
| Orders and projects needed more cross-checking | Orders and delivery became easier to follow together |
| Client updates could be scattered | The client portal gave both sides one place to look |
| Kamrul moved between several platforms | More of the workflow could be handled in one place |
Looking at it this way, the benefit was less about “having everything in one dashboard.”
That phrase gets used for almost every SaaS product.
What mattered to WebKooker was more practical.
Kamrul had fewer reasons to leave one system, open another, find the same client again, and rebuild the context in his head.
Within a Few Months, WebKooker Called the Improvement 10x
After using Agency Handy for a few months, WebKooker described the improvement in subscription and order management as 10x.
I would not interpret that as WebKooker suddenly delivering ten times more projects.
That was not what Kamrul was describing. The improvement was in how much easier the operation became to manage.
And when you hear how the previous workflow worked, the number makes more sense.
The old process required Kamrul to stay on top of several systems. One might tell him what the client bought. Another showed what the team was working on. Something else handled payment. Another place might contain the latest update.
The work itself could be moving perfectly well while Kamrul was still spending time checking whether everything around it was in sync.
Agency Handy reduced a lot of that checking. For a subscription agency, that matters because these are not one-time tasks.
They repeat every time a client sends another request, renews, pays an invoice, gives feedback, or starts another piece of work.
The Client Portal Was One of the Parts Kamrul Liked Most
When discussing the parts of Agency Handy that had been most useful, Kamrul highlighted the client portal.
That choice makes sense once you understand how WebKooker works. With recurring clients, the relationship does not reset after each job.
There is history.
Previous work matters. Feedback matters. Billing matters. Current requests matter.
If that information is spread across different tools, both the client and the agency have to keep finding their way back into the conversation.
The portal gave WebKooker a clearer place for that relationship to continue.
Project information, updates, invoices, orders, and feedback could stay closer together.
For Kamrul, that meant fewer situations where he needed to work out where a particular piece of information had ended up.
And for clients, it gave them a more obvious place to check what was happening.
It Still Wasn’t Perfect
Kamrul also mentioned one area where he would like to see Agency Handy improve: payment options.
I think that is worth including because it makes the story more believable. Very few businesses adopt a platform and love absolutely everything about it. Usually, the decision is more practical.
Does this solve the problem that is costing us the most time?
In WebKooker’s case, the answer seems to have been yes. The payment setup could improve.
But the bigger issue for Kamrul was the amount of operational work happening across subscriptions, orders, invoices, projects, and client communication.
That was where Agency Handy made the bigger difference.
What Stuck With Me From the Conversation
The interesting part of WebKooker’s story is that the agency did not have some huge operational crisis.
It had dozens of small bits of friction. And those are often harder to notice.
You open another tab. You check another system. You look up the same client again. You confirm whether an invoice matches an order.
Nothing feels serious enough to fix on its own. But together, those little tasks can quietly become part of someone’s job.
That was the situation Kamrul described.
Agency Handy did not change what WebKooker sells or how the team builds websites. It reduced some of the work required simply to keep the business moving.
A few months in, WebKooker described that change as making subscription and order management 10x easier.
And for Kamrul, that meant spending less of the day managing the systems around the work and more of it on the business itself.
